|
Historic Reports
Larry Myles Reports
|
In all nations and in all
periods of history, intellectual
exploits were the work of a few men
and were appreciated only by a small
elite. The many looked upon these
feats with hatred and disdain, at
best with indifference. |
April, 2011
The True Renaissance
The Renaissance of Thorium-Based
Nuclear Energy
China Emerges as the Global Energy Leader
Lost in the babble and deliberate confusion
of international news; a new war
in the Middle-East
that is not
really a war (?); a badly damaged
uranium-powered reactor in Japan that
continues to defy solution; the growing
debate about an
anti-industrial American
president who has
successfully made blurred and confused
dithering into an art form, we almost missed
the Financial Times recently reporting that
China has officially surpassed the U.S. as
the global manufacturing leader, thus ending
America’s 110-year reign.
Receiving even less press;
China emerges as
the global energy leader with Thorium!
Turning away from the dated and dangerous
uranium-based nuclear power system,
China’s Academy of Science has wisely moved
toward the safety of a thorium-based,
molten salt reactor system.
Removing Thorium From a Forced and
Dismal Seclusion
Worth a note:
-
The reason we are not placing
more emphasis on thorium as a
safe energy source is
entirely political.
-
Thorium is more abundant than
uranium.
-
There is enough known thorium to
supply our energy needs for the
next 1,000 years.
-
Thorium cannot be used to
produce the raw material for
nuclear weaponry.
-
Thorium reactors cannot meltdown
under any circumstances.
-
Thorium can be used to ‘burn’ up
existing stockpiles of weapons
grade plutonium.
Ignoring the Distracted Babble;
What is Thorium?
Thorium (Th) is a naturally-occurring metal
that is only slightly radioactive. It was
first discovered in 1882 by the Swedish
chemist, Jons Jakob Berzelius. In its pure
form, thorium is a silvery-white metal that
over time slowly tarnishes in air.
Thorium
boasts having one of the highest melting
points of all oxides (3300° Celsius). When
heated, thorium ignites and burns with a
brilliant white light. Current uses include
light bulb elements, lantern mantles,
powerful arc-light lamps, heat-resistant
ceramics and welding electrodes. Glass
containing thorium oxide has a high
refractive index and is used in top quality
lenses for cameras and scientific equipment.
The most common source of thorium is the
phosphate mineral, monazite; which
can contain up to 12% thorium phosphate.
The world's known monazite resources
are estimated to be approximately 1.2
million tonnes; two thirds of which are in
the heavy mineral sands deposits on the
south and east coasts of India.
Worth a note: Monazite also contains
economically extractable rare-earth metals
such as cerium, lanthanum, neodymium,
yttrium and iridium. An immediate benefit of
producing thorium would be the creation of
additional supplies of strategic metals.
Earnestly Espoused as
a Viable Energy Option?
Before that question can be answered, we
must lightly tap the history of nuclear
power. It is important to remember that
capable and efficient nuclear pioneers such
as Alvin Weinberg, Eugene Wigner and other
esteemed men of science connected to the
Manhattan Project believed thorium
trumped uranium as a more certain and
verifiable way of generating electricity
through nuclear energy. The only downside to
thorium? It was useless for their immediate
goal – the building of a nuclear bomb!
Two detonated war-time bombs later and a
glut of global destruction buried in secret
silo’s, we are still relying upon
uranium; albeit now allegedly for peaceful
purposes. Case in point: There are roughly
450 uranium based nuclear power plants on
earth, with another 32 under construction;
and approximately 150 planned to be
constructed over the next decade. Together,
these nuclear power plants produce over 15%
of the world’s total energy use. With
numbers like this, one would assume that
uranium is the answer, has always been the
answer, and will continue to be the answer;
not so!
The Thorium Renaissance
….is not a misnomer; but yet another cogent
and conclusive example of American
Exceptionalism – a cherished ideal the current
regime in Washington goes to great pains to
discredit. One has to only research
President Dwight Eisenhower’s “Atoms
for Peace”. Despite the fact that
conventional fuel prices were low in 1957,
and there were plentiful supplies of coal,
oil and natural gas, America constructed its
first thorium nuclear power generating plant
at Shippingport, Pennsylvania.
Even though the experimental Shippingport
plant proved beyond a doubt that the
thorium-based breeder technology worked both
safely and efficiently in a commercial scale
reactor; the combination of low-priced
fossil fuels and the abundance of (military
generated) stockpiles of existing and
enriched uranium meant the thorium-based
breeder technology was not an economically
viable option. The plant was decommissioned
in 1982, and the concept of using thorium as
a safe, efficient and abundant energy source
almost faded into obscurity.
Thorium is
Not
an Economic Absurdity
|
A Note on Uranium: Overall,
the price of uranium is decreasing
and appears inevitable to continue
to drop in the short term as more
countries delay and/or suspend their
plans for uranium-based nuclear
power plants. Countries like China
and Japan have already halted their
uranium-based nuclear programs and
are already making plans to burn
more diesel, coal and liquid natural
gas to off-set the power shortfall;
in turn this will raise the prices
of oil, natural gas and coal. That
being said, developments in
thorium-based nuclear power will
commence, as in the long run,
nations cannot depend on
increasingly costly and
environmentally unfriendly sources
of energy.
|
Strange Days...Instead of consciously and
purposely embracing the gift of thorium, we
now find ourselves living in a kool-aid
moment where a large segment of the world
population actually believes that the
forced, and heavily subsidized use of a
forest of windmills and acres of plated
mirrors can be ramped up to provide
sufficient and sustainable energy to supply
future energy requirements;
ignoring the embellished truth that
green energy supplies less than 2% of our current
energy needs!
Notwithstanding the inevitable demise of the
world’s bird population thanks to windmills,
let us review what it takes to construct
just one of these inefficient "green" power
generators: 260 tonnes of steel that is made
from burning 170 tonnes of coal and 300
tonnes of iron ore; all mined and
transported by hydrocarbon-based products.
The average life-cycle of a windmill? Two
decades, give or take a year or two.
Whereas one tonne of thorium can produce as
much energy as 200 tonnes of uranium or over
3,000,000 tonnes of coal. To put this all in
human terms; less than ten tablespoons
of thorium could provide the total energy
needs for a single person during their
entire lifetime.
Note: The International Energy Agency states
the world must invest $25 trillion over the
next two decades to avert an energy shock.
You can already see the negative results of
countries fighting each other for control of
fossil-based energy. Thus far, after a
promising start, America has turned away
from thorium and Europe has dropped the
ball. Fortunately, China has the vision to
understand the importance of
thorium-generated energy.
Along
with China, the world’s premier
manufacturing giant, India is also
aggressively investing in research to build
thorium-based reactors. The government of
India has made it clear their long-term
objective is to become totally
energy-independent by taking advantage of
its vast reserves of thorium.
Setting aside President Obama’s curious and
inexpressible ‘sputnik moment’, if Americans
do not get back on the ball they could find
themselves importing technology originally
developed over sixty years ago at
Shippingport, Pennsylvania. Not to be an
uber-alarmist, but if Americans enjoyed the
dubious political alliances based on
foreign-oil dependency, they are really
going to love foreign-nuclear dependency!
At this point I am researching only two
publicly-traded Canadian junior exploration
companies that appear to understand
the importance of thorium. I have been told
by investment specialists that I may be way
early in the game for the market to
appreciate investing in thorium. I would
have to disagree, as monazite, which as
previously stated contains up to 12% thorium oxide also
contains
economically extractable rare-earth metals
such as cerium, lanthanum, neodymium,
yttrium and iridium. An immediate benefit of
producing thorium would be the creation of
additional supplies of strategic metals.
Definitely worth both current and
near-future consideration!
As far as current energy related
opportunities are concerned, there is yet no
substitute for our most basic and reliable
fuel source: coal. With the prices of
coal continuing to appreciate, we must
remain true to our reality-based investment
stratagem and invest in what is right in
front of us – coal companies with strong
management and assets in the ground.
Larry Myles
Larry Myles Reports
604-408-7600
1-877-405-7600
Receive Larry Myles Reports
Larry Myles is neither a
geologist nor a financial analyst. I do not
purport to offer personal investment advice
nor recommendations. While all statements of
fact are derived from reliable sources, an d
are believed to be accurate, I make no
warrant that they are so. You must do your
own research and check statements of fact
for yourself. My opinions are precisely
that, my opinions. I do not accept any
responsibility for any gains or losses you
may experience resulting from actions taken
based on my opinions. If not otherwise
qualified, you should consult with your own
personal financial advisor before engaging
in any investment activities. Larry Myles
Reports does not provide individual
investment advice, act as an investment
advisor, or individually advocate the
purchase or sale of any security or
investment. Larry Myles may actively trade
in the investments discussed in this
publication. Larry Myles may have a
substantial position in the securities
recommended and may increase or decrease
such positions without notice.
I do not know
your personal financial circumstances. I am
not your personal financial advisor. You
must do your own due diligence. By entering
this web site, or reading LMR reports, you
acknowledge and accept the foregoing.
|